Steiner Predator vs Merlin 10x42

[adykes]

My husband is buying new binoculars. He seems set on the Steiner
Merlin 10x42. I haven't done extensive research, but from what I've
read there is very little difference between the Steiner Predator Pro
10x42 and the Steiner Merlin 10x42. When I see "predator" it seems to
be related to hunting while "merlin" is geared toward bird watching.
But all the specks seem to be nearly the same, but with a significant
price difference. Anyone have input you'd like to share.

Thanks!

[Ilja Friedel]

Post by adykes
My husband is buying new binoculars. He seems set on the Steiner
Merlin 10x42. I haven't done extensive research, but from what I've
read there is very little difference between the Steiner Predator Pro
10x42 and the Steiner Merlin 10x42. When I see "predator" it seems to
be related to hunting while "merlin" is geared toward bird watching.
But all the specks seem to be nearly the same, but with a significant
price difference. Anyone have input you'd like to share.

I have no prior experience and just compared the German language website.
It seems they are called SkyHawk and Wildlife Pro there.
The main difference is, that the more expensive binocular is nitrogen
filled and submersible to 5m instead of being splash proof. Some fuzzy
"Pro" optics (no details) and 30 vs. 10 years of warranty.

But ask a dealer what he thinks.

Ilja.

[peter]

Post by adykes
My husband is buying new binoculars. He seems set on the Steiner
Merlin 10x42. I haven't done extensive research, but from what I've
read there is very little difference between the Steiner Predator Pro
10x42 and the Steiner Merlin 10x42. When I see "predator" it seems to
be related to hunting while "merlin" is geared toward bird watching.
But all the specks seem to be nearly the same, but with a significant
price difference. Anyone have input you'd like to share.

They look very similar, but the Predator model has better waterproofing
specs (submersible vs. rain resistant), slightly better coating
technology for less reflection, closer near-focus (6' vs. 8'),
marginally wider field of view, a bit longer eye relief, and a longer
warranty. Of those, the waterproofing is probably the biggest
difference - but if I were likely to drop them in the water I'd choose
to do it to some much less expensive binoculars. Personal choice as to
whether any of those differences are substantial enough to justify the
price jump.